Saturday, April 13, 2013

British Euroskeptics claim Thatcher, but was she in their camp?

Though held up today by British Euroskeptics as an icon, the late prime minister left a legacy in Europe that is not as one-sided as it might at first appear.

By Jason Walsh,?Correspondent / April 11, 2013

British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl during a press conference in the Frankfurt City Hall in Frankfurt in Feb. 1989. Though an icon of modern Euroskeptics, Mrs. Thatcher's relationship with Europe was more complex and contradictory than she is now portrayed.

Kurt Strumpf/AP/File

Enlarge

Today, the late British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher is an icon of the euroskeptic right, whose antipathy to everything European has emboldened not only generations of Conservative Party lawmakers, but also the United Kingdom Independence Party now nipping at its heels.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

Indeed, one of the moments that most contributed to her not undeserved reputation for recalcitrance centered upon the expansion of Europe's powers. Addressing then European Commission President Jacques Delors' desire to make the European Parliament into Europe's primary democratic institution, with the Commission as the executive and the Council of Ministers as senate, she famously declared "No, no, no!"

But despite being viewed as an anti-European firebrand, Mrs. Thatcher's European legacy, marked by contradiction and compromise, is not as simple and one-sided as it might at first appear.

A shaper of modern Europe

Neither Thatcher's belligerent style nor her deeply-held feelings of British nationalism or desire for Anglo-American harmony meant she refused to deal with the EU. In 1987, for instance, she signed the Single European Act and in 1990 agreed, albeit reluctantly, to join the Exchange Rate Mechanism that eventually led to the creation of the euro currency.

Stephen Booth, research director at Open Europe, a think thank based in Brussels and London that advocates a non-federal EU of nation states, says Thatcher's vision for the EU was much closer to that proposed by his organization than many now realize.

"She became more euroskeptic as she left office. Things like the single [European] market were very much in line with her vision," he says.

Thatcher's ambivalence toward Europe caused a deep split in her party that so damaged the government of her successor, John Major, that many believe it contributed to keeping the Conservatives out of power for a generation. In the face of an EU in economic crisis and the single European currency on the ropes, some now argue she was ahead of her time.

"Her contribution was to liberalize Europe," says Booth. "In a way, she exported her ideas to Europe. [Current British PM] David Cameron is, like Conservative Prime Ministers before him, trying to renegotiate Europe around the nation state."

And praise for her ideas is now coming from an unexpected direction: the European press. Most of the continental European center-right has long been pro-EU, but a new skepticism is in the air.?

Italian newspaper Libero says Thatcher's passing leaves Italy alone in a "Merkel-euro nightmare," denouncing European federalism as a faith-based project. Estonia's Postimees hails her anti-communism and support for free-market policies. Germany's Die Welt worries, however, that her euroskepticism may yet split her party in two.

Defense of the nation state

Joseph Cohen, a philosopher who teaches on issues around sovereignty at University College Dublin, says Thatcher's greatest legacy in Europe was to defend the traditions of European nation states.

"Her legacy is to mark the impossibility of a Europe in which there is an EU citizenship over and above national citizenship. In this sense she was extremely clear-sighted. There cannot be a United States of Europe precisely because of the very deep and singular history of each nation, and therefore the history of these relationships is the history of Europe."

She was not entirely correct, however, says Dr. Cohen.

"Where she was not foresighted was that, for worse or for better, what drives frontiers today is not so much these traditions, but economics."

And her nationalism was out of step with European thinking at the time, and may have contributed to her resistance to a result of the most significant Europe-wide event of her premiership: the collapse of the Eastern Bloc of Soviet satellite states, in particular the 1989 breaching of the Berlin Wall.

An ardent anti-communist, she joyously celebrated the end of what her close political ally US President Ronald Reagan called "the Evil Empire," and is credited by conservatives with playing a role in communism's decline.

But Thatcher objected to German reunification. Germany's then-Chancellor Helmut Kohl was "capable of anything," she said, according to a French diplomatic cable revealed several years ago. Her fear may not have been grounded solely in "Little Englandism," so much as fear of the economic might of industrial Germany.

(Mr. Kohl, speaking to Reuters, Monday remained magnanimous, saying of his late rival: "You could only speak of her with great respect, even if on some things you were of a different opinion on one point or another.")

And her nationalism appeared to contain an element of colonialism, says the Paris-born Cohen, who says his first memory of Thatcher was Britain waging war against Argentina.

"We were growing-up in the feverish build-up to '92 [the year the EU's Maastricht Treaty was signed]. We were all going to be the same, use the same money, no borders, and we didn't understand how it was possible for a European to defend a form of colonialism."

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/z02-Lb6-Cnc/British-Euroskeptics-claim-Thatcher-but-was-she-in-their-camp

second degree murders bobby petrino brian dunn vin scully petrino fired george zimmerman charged big sean

BlackBerry to ask regulators to probe report on returns

By Euan Rocha and Emily Flitter

TORONTO/NEW YORK (Reuters) - BlackBerry plans to ask securities regulators in Canada and the United States to probe what it said is a "false and misleading" report that consumer return rates for BlackBerry's new Z10 smartphone have been especially high.

The Canadian company, which has pinned its turnaround hopes on its new BlackBerry 10 line of smartphones, went on the offensive on Friday after the report from Boston-based research and investment firm Detwiler Fenton sent its stock tumbling on Thursday.

BlackBerry said return rates for its flagship Z10 devices have been at, or below, its forecasts and in line with industry norms.

"To suggest otherwise is either a gross misreading of the data or a willful manipulation," Chief Executive Thorsten Heins said in a statement. "Such a conclusion is absolutely without basis and BlackBerry will not leave it unchallenged."

BlackBerry said Detwiler Fenton had so far refused to share its report or its methods. It said it would present a formal request for an investigation to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and to the Ontario Securities Commission, which is Canada's major securities regulator, over the next few days.

Detwiler has had run-ins with regulators in the past, documents reviewed by Reuters show. But none of the cases involved questions about the accuracy of Detwiler's research or were linked to BlackBerry.

The OSC said it would review the matter once it receives a formal complaint.

"After the first 14 days, quality performance of the Z10 has been in line with similar devices we've launched," said Debra Lewis, a spokeswoman for Verizon Wireless.

A spokeswoman for Detwiler did not respond to a phone call and an email from Reuters seeking comment. The director of research also did not respond to a call seeking comment.

"We believe key retail partners have seen a significant increase in Z10 returns to the point where, in several cases, returns are now exceeding sales, a phenomenon we have never seen before," its report said. Detwiler Fenton gave no details on how it had gleaned this information.

While a number of brokerage firms have in recent weeks published reports saying Z10 sales in the U.S. market are slow, none of them have flagged any major concerns about returns.

Since 2007, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the industry body that oversees broker-dealers, has fined Detwiler over $250,000 and has cited it for several compliance violations over the past decade.

In December 2011, FINRA sanctioned Detwiler for failing to properly supervise its employees and for allowing its brokers to make more trades than necessary in clients' accounts to boost commissions during a period between 2006 and 2009.

In 2007, the firm, which was then called Detwiler Mitchell Fenton & Graves, settled administrative proceedings that the SEC brought against it for failing to supervise Bradford Bleidt, a former employee who had been simultaneously running a $30 million Ponzi scheme.

TURNAROUND PLAN

BlackBerry is attempting to claw back market share lost to rivals such as Apple Inc's iPhone and Samsung Electronics Co's Galaxy line of smartphones with its new line of devices, powered by the revamped BlackBerry 10 operating system.

The new Z10 touchscreen smartphone, the first of its new devices, hit store shelves earlier this year. And the Q10, with BlackBerry's famed physical keyboard, will go on sale in Canada and the United Kingdom before the end of April.

BlackBerry, which has changed its name from Research In Motion, has yet to prove to the market that its new devices can trigger a turnaround. The company expects to report break-even results in the current quarter, but a true picture will not emerge until later this year.

BlackBerry stock has remained highly volatile as analysts are split on whether the turnaround plan will succeed. Research reports often bring major swings in the company's share price.

Shares of Waterloo, Ontario-based BlackBerry, which fell 7.7 percent on Thursday, closed up less than a percent on Friday at $13.64 on Nasdaq.

(Reporting by Euan Rocha, Emily Flitter, Allison Martell, Sinead Carew and Noel Randewich; Editing by Janet Guttsman, Bernadette Baum, Peter Galloway and Tim Dobbyn)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/blackberry-ask-regulators-probe-report-returns-124314017--finance.html

kindle fire Jenny Johnson olivier martinez ny lottery Ohio Lottery Colorado Lottery Pa Lottery

how many interviews are too many? ? Ask a Manager

A reader writes:

I applied for a job that I thought I?d be a good fit for. It turned out that I was applying to a recruiter, and he phoned me the next day and wanted to meet. We had a coffee meeting at one of the outlets the company I was applying to is running. I clicked with him immediately, and he said he wanted to introduce me to the client, which would involve a meeting with a recruiter who was working for the company and charged with recruiting for this position.

When I met the second guy, he said he would definitely like to introduce me to the owner/director of the business.

I met with the owner/director, who was really cool. We talked for over an hour, and half an hour after I left, the original recruiter was in touch saying how much she liked me and wanted to meet up again.

An email heads-up from Recruiter 1 said that she would like to hear me explain what I can offer the company and how my skills can help move it forward. I decided to compile notes on all areas? sales, communication, people, costs, then round off with talking through the words people have used to describe me in feedback i?ve had throughout my career. I thought we had covered this already and in detail.

I got to the interview this morning and there was another man there, who the owner had worked with before with huge success. When I sat down, they said, ?So, talk??

This threw me completely and I started talking with a voice I?ve never heard myself using before, just pure nerves. I talked through everything I had prepared and they both said I had covered everything. They did comment on my nerves at the end, and I tried to explain that I am not always like this in business meetings, but this being about all me and at such a late stage? yeah, I was nervous.

The reason my head is on fire just now is that at the end they said, ?We?ll get back to you on Monday, we think? we might need candidates at this stage to complete a personality test. We?ve hired badly in the past and we don?t want to make mistakes again.?

Meanwhile I?m thinking, ?Christ, this is the fourth interview I?ve had regarding this? I?ve been very open and honest and I think I?ve given a full picture of who I am and what I can do.?

They kept talking about avoiding a bad fit, but as far as I was concerned I had decided I really wanted to work for them after interview #3 and told them that. So I guess my quandary is? getting a second interview is a signal that they?re really interested, getting a third one should be even more positive, right? But a fourth or a fifth? I just do not know what to make of this; my head is buzzing.

Getting the right fit is important ? and while you?ve decided that you?d like to work for them, that doesn?t mean that they?re sure that the fit is right on their side.

And sometimes it does take multiple interviews to be sure that the fit is right. And after all, it?s better for both of you to invest time at this stage than for you to end up struggling in the job and quitting or getting fired later.

But when an employer is doing this many interviews and asking for a lot of a candidate?s time, it?s really important for them to ensure that they?re organized and strategic about it ? so that they?re not using someone?s time irresponsibly. And that?s what worries me about this company. They had you do two separate interviews with recruiters before you actually talked with a hiring manager, and when you finally did talk with a hiring manager, they apparently didn?t bother to ask you how your skills could help them (since they needed to ask for a later meeting for that), and then they had you return for a fourth meeting without explaining why that was necessary.

Moreover, in that fourth meeting, it sounds like they weren?t especially warm or collegial (?So, talk??), which is concerning at any stage, but especially in this context.

What we can conclude is that, at a minimum, this is a company that doesn?t quite know how to hire well and isn?t especially concerned about being considerate of you.

So, what can you do? You can certainly say, ?I?m very interested in working with you, but before we go any further, can you tell me what the rest of the process is likely to look like and your timeline for filling the job?? That might get you some useful information, or it might not. It also might nudge them into thinking about how this is all coming across to you, or it might not. But it?s worth asking.

You should also do some serious probing into their culture, and how they make decisions, and how they operate in general ? because those are things that will have a major impact on your quality of life while working there, as well as your ability to succeed in your work for them ? and right now there are some red flags going up around that stuff, so you should really do some due diligence there.

To be clear, it?s not the number of interviews that concerns me on its own ? sometimes that really is warranted, for some jobs (although I don?t know if this is one of them or not). What concerns me is their haphazard approach to it, and you want to see if that approach is typical for them in other areas.

Source: https://www.askamanager.org/2013/04/how-many-interviews-are-too-many.html

ufc 144 james jones james jones aladdin black forest ufc 144 fight card ufc 144 results

Friday, April 12, 2013

PFT: Te'o says Alabama game doesn't 'define my career'

Dwight FreeneyAP

With almost a month of free agency in the books, here is our rundown on the best players still available at each position ? a list that includes some of PFT?s top 100 free agents as of earlier in the offseason.

Quarterback: Byron Leftwich.

The Seahawks? move for Brady Quinn made a lot of sense ? he was probably the best backup option left. Leftwich has a strong arm and plenty of experience but has struggled to stay healthy.

Down the road, Tim Tebow seems a solid bet?to join the jobless QB ranks, and the moment he does, he becomes the X-factor of the group. Will another team give him a chance?

Running back:?Ahmad Bradshaw.

Durability looms as the major concern with Bradshaw, who has had foot issues.

Fullback: Mike Cox.

Cox started 12 games in the last two seasons for Atlanta.

Wide receiver: Brandon Lloyd, Julian Edelman.

Lloyd would be a fine short-term solution for a team looking for an outside receiver.? Edelman?s youth and versatility give him a slight nod over other candidates for this spot, but can he stay healthy in a regular role?

Tight end: Dallas Clark.

The best receiving option at his position still left on the market. However, he turns 34 in June.

Offensive tackle: Andre Smith, Bryant McKinnie.

Smith has a strong 2012 season but comes with injury and consistency risk. Nevertheless, the young right tackle is the best free agent available. McKinnie gets the nod over Tyson Clabo and Eric Winston on account of his long track record at left tackle.? That said, McKinnie will be 34 in September, and his conditioning can be an issue.

Offensive guard: Brandon Moore, Stephen Peterman.

Moore started 137 connective games for the Jets, while Peterman played every game the last three seasons before being released by the Lions. Both can be serviceable for 2013.

Center: Dan Koppen.

Started 12 games for the AFC West-winning Broncos in 2012. Turns 34 in September.

Defensive end: Dwight Freeney, John Abraham.

They are both pass-rushing aces, but they?re on the wrong side of 30.

Defensive tackle: Sedrick Ellis, Richard Seymour.

Ellis never lived up to his first-round status in New Orleans, but he will only be 28 at the start of the season. Seymour could still help a team, but Jason Cole of Yahoo! Sports reported in March that it might take a lucrative deal to get the longtime standout lineman back onto the field in 2013.

Outside linebacker: Shaun Phillips, Daryl Smith.

Phillips will be 32 in May, but he?notched 9.5 sacks in 2012, so it?s not as if he couldn?t be of assistance to a defense that uses 3-4 looks.?Smith was limited to two games a season ago with a groin injury, but he?s the best 4-3 outside linebacker available. Age could also be a concern with Smith, who turned 31 in March. Let?s also mention James Harrison, like Phillips an interesting short-term option for a club employing a ?30? front.

Inside linebacker: Karlos Dansby, Brian Urlacher.

Dansby lost his job when the Dolphins added Dannell Ellerbe, but he comes off a 134-tackle season and has a long track record of success. There?s probably still a place for him in the league, and the Bengals are meeting with him on Wednesday. Urlacher fit best in Chicago, but the door seems to have closed on his return.? Besides, he?ll be 35 in May. Honorable mention goes to Nick Barnett, who has notched more than 100 tackles in every season in which he?s played even close to 16 games.

Cornerback: Antoine Winfield, Quentin Jammer.

Winfield is reportedly getting a good deal of attention in free agency; the ex-Viking is tough and skilled. Reliability and availability are Jammer?s strengths at this stage of the game. He?s made 161 career starts and missed just four games in 11 NFL seasons, all with San Diego.

Safety: Kerry Rhodes, Charles Woodson.

This position was thinned further Tuesday when Dawan Landry agreed with the Jets. Rhodes, who intercepted four passes a season ago, has shown a playmaking flair throughout his career, but he will be 31 this season. Woodson can play multiple secondary spots but has said his phone isn?t exactly ringing off the hook just yet.

Placekicker: Steven Hauschka.

Only 27 years old, Hauschka connected on 24-of-27 field goals in 2012 for Seattle.

Punter: Brian Moorman.

Bounced back in 2012 stint with Cowboys, posting a 38.9-yard net average in 12 games.

Return specialist: ?Josh Cribbs.

Cribbs, who had knee surgery earlier in the offseason, can be a difference-making returner and coverage player.

Source: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/04/10/manti-teo-the-alabama-game-doesnt-define-my-career/related

cyprus cyprus Bracketology Erin Go Bragh St Patrick lisa vanderpump Dancing With the Stars 2013

Thursday, April 11, 2013

Rehtaeh Parsons, Canadian Teen, Kills Herself Due to Alleged Rape and Bullying

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2013/04/rehtaeh-parsons-canadian-teen-kills-herself-due-to-alleged-rape/

southern miss rod blagojevich rod blagojevich uconn vcu mario williams unlv

Paris exhibit asks: Was there an Italian Monet?

A visitors looks at the painting ''After Lunch" (La Pergola),1868, by Silvestro Lega, at the Orangerie Museum in Paris, Tuesday April 9, 2013. A new exhibit at Paris? Orangery museum called ?The Macchiaioli: the Italian Impressionists?? explores how a Florence-based art movement that predated French impressionism by a decade was already using the themes of light, the outdoors and spontaneity that?s more associated with the likes of Monet or Renoir. (AP Photo/Jacques Brinon)

A visitors looks at the painting ''After Lunch" (La Pergola),1868, by Silvestro Lega, at the Orangerie Museum in Paris, Tuesday April 9, 2013. A new exhibit at Paris? Orangery museum called ?The Macchiaioli: the Italian Impressionists?? explores how a Florence-based art movement that predated French impressionism by a decade was already using the themes of light, the outdoors and spontaneity that?s more associated with the likes of Monet or Renoir. (AP Photo/Jacques Brinon)

Visitors looks at the painting "towing scene in the Cascine park of Florene" (1864) painted by Telemaco Signorini, at the Orangerie Museum in Paris, Tuesday April 9, 2013. A new exhibit at Paris? Orangery museum called ?The Macchiaioli: the Italian Impressionists?? explores how a Florence-based art movement that predated French impressionism by a decade was already using the themes of light, the outdoors and spontaneity that?s more associated with the likes of Monet or Renoir. (AP Photo/Jacques Brinon)

A visitor walks past the painting ''Garibaldi in Palermo" (1860), center, by Giovanni Fattori,( 1825-1908) at the Orangerie Museum in Paris, Tuesday April 9, 2013. A new exhibit at Paris? Orangery museum called ?The Macchiaioli: the Italian Impressionists?? explores how a Florence-based art movement that predated French impressionism by a decade was already using the themes of light, the outdoors and spontaneity that?s more associated with the likes of Monet or Renoir. (AP Photo/Jacques Brinon)

(AP) ? Years before Impressionism ? the influential Paris-based art movement ? began, a similar style of painting capturing colorful impressions of light may have existed in Italy, according to a new exhibit.

The show at Paris' Orangery museum displays works from 1860s Florence with vivid, dappled light ? in a strikingly similar way to famed painters like Claude Monet from the 1870s.

The movement was called "Macchiaioli," after the Italian for "stain," to evoke splashes of light in the painting.

"It's practically unknown around the world, but like the Impressionists they used the bright light of open air, contrasting shadows, and they wished to rebel against academic painting by going out and in the open air," said curator Beatrice Avanzi.

"The Macchiaioli: the Italian Impressionists?" show runs Wednesday through July 22.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2013-04-09-France-Italian%20Impressionism/id-915b0bbb3dc34be0b19cbb7d9d7007c5

New Orleans Pelicans chris brown hillary clinton apple stock Pro Bowl 2013 Kick Ass Torrents jamarcus russell

Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Primitive Fish With Butt Fins Reveals Quirks of Evolution

A 370-milion-year-old, primitive fish sported a weird pair of fins just below its anus, new research shows.

The strange appendages, detailed today (April 9) in the journal Biology Letters, were found on an ancient jawless fish called Euphanerops longaevus that lived around the time that jawless fishes like lampreys split off from jawed vertebrates, which include everything from sharks to humans.

"What's weird about this organism is that it had a paired anal fin. It's unique ? no other known fossil or modern fish is known to have that disposition," said study co-author Robert Sansom, a paleontologist at the University of Manchester in the U.K.

The findings suggest that early in primitive vertebrates' history, evolution experimented with a number of wacky body plans, only some of which survived, Sansom told LiveScience. [Image Gallery: The Freakiest Looking Fish]

Early fish

The Euphanerops fish were 3.9 inches (10 centimeters) long and looked somewhat like modern-day eels. The specimens were unearthed in a fossil bed in Miguasha, Quebec, decades ago, and were stored in collections in the National History Museum in London and the Museum d'Histoire Naturelle, Miguasha, in Quebec.

Previously, researchers weren't sure exactly what to make of the creatures' weird fins. Some thought the anal appendages might actually have been displaced from another part of the animal's body in the fossilization process.

Early body plan

The researchers weren't convinced of the displacement explanation. By comparing the 3D surfaces of the fossil under a microscope, the team concluded that the fin pair was actually located below the anus on the living creature. Though it's not clear exactly how the fins were used, the fins most likely helped the fish get around, Sansom said.

The fossil dates to a critical period of vertebrate evolution: Jawed and jawless vertebrates diverged roughly around this time. Eventually jawed fish developed paired fins (but not anal fins) that evolved to become arms and legs. In fact, the same genes code for shark fins and human limbs.

The discovery changes the view of how fishes were evolving at this time, Sansom said.

"Rather than gradual acquisition of complex characteristics, maybe there was a bit more experimentation and odd acquisitions," he said.

Specialized trait?

The finding of paired anal fins is "beautifully illustrated," said Michael Coates, a vertebrate paleontologist at the University of Chicago, who was not involved in the study.

"It might just be the first vestige, it might be some kind of precursor to generating paired fins" that are commonly seen throughout jawed vertebrates, Coates told LiveScience.

But it's also possible they were a specialized trait that only Euphanerops possessed, not reflective of the evolutionary history of jawed vertebrates as a whole, Coates said.

Follow Tia Ghose on Twitter @tiaghose.?Follow?LiveScience@livescience,Facebook?&Google+. Original article on?LiveScience.com.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/primitive-fish-butt-fins-reveals-quirks-evolution-230801959.html

meteor showers 2012 ufc 145 jones vs evans marian hossa philip humber red sox white sox